Cicindela limbata – epilogue

In my Lucky 13 post, I featured Cicindela limbata (sandy tiger beetle) from north of Grand Island, near the easternmost edge of the Nebraska Sandhills. This species is restricted to dry sand blow out and dune habitats away from water, thus its distribution in Nebraska largely coincides with that of the Sandhills themselves. Nebraska populations are assigned to the nominate subspecies, which is characterized by extensively developed white maculations on the elytra, Nebraska, Grant Co., nr. Hyannis, 3.4 mi S Hwy 2 on Hwy 61, 26.ix.2008, coll. T.C.MacRaewith the sutural area and small discal markings metallic green or blue. The whitish areas on the elytra and dense pilosity on the undersurface, along with their habit of digging into the sand during the midday hours, are obvious adaptations for reflecting heat and avoiding the high temperatures that occur in their white sand habitats. In the more eastern areas of the Sandhills, the green sutural areas of the elytra are suffused with a reddish cast (see this photo in Lucky 13), while in populations further to the west no such reddish suffusion is seen. The individual featured in these two photos was found in the western Sandhills (near Hyannis) and is one of the individuals that I dug from their midday burrows (see Sand Hills Success). Had I not been clued into this behavior when I visited this site, I would have left with only the single individual that was seen at the surface. That individual was captured immediately, and further searching for active adults to take photographs of were unsuccessful – until I started digging, that is. Unfortunately, adults that have just been caught or dug out of their burrows aren’t the most cooperative photography subjects, so one of them was kept alive and placed in a terrarium upon my return to St. Louis. (These photos were taken about a week after I returned, and the individual lived for another seven weeks on a diet of 3rd instar fall armyworm and black cutworm larvae. I eventually trained it to grab larvae directly from the forceps – very entertaining indeed! Also, while these photos from the terrarium confines are adequate for illustrating the species, I think they still lack that undefinable spark that is caputured in true field photographs with unmanipulated individuals – compare to this photo).

Cicindela limbata, with its five recognized subspecies1, has one of the more interesting distributions of North American species (see Pearson et al. 2006). In the main area of distribution, the southernmost populations, distributed through most of Nebraska and adjacent areas of Wyoming and South Dakota, are considered nominotypical. A distributional gap to the north separates these populations from Nebraska, Grant Co., nr. Hyannis, 3.4 mi S Hwy 2 on Hwy 61, 26.ix.2008, coll. T.C.MacRaesubspecies nympha, which occurs in sand habitats of northern Montana and North Dakota and further northward into the Canadian Prairie Provinces. Individuals from these populations exhibit even greater development of the white maculations but darker intervening areas. Another distributional gap separates nympha from subspecies hyperborea, which (as its name suggests) occurs even further north in open sand habitats in the pine and poplar forests of northern Alberta and Saskatchewan and adjacent areas of the Northwest Territories. Subspecies hyperborea is characterized by its greatly reduced white maculations (thus, exhibiting expanded dark areas) and overall smaller size, both of which may be regarded as heat conservation adaptations for the far boreal climate in which it lives.

1 Excluding the federally endangered Cicindela albissima (Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle), which was recently elevated to species status based on mitochondrial DNA evidence (Morgan et al. 2000).

The fragmented nature of the main limbata population in the upper Great Plains and into the boreal forests is, in itself, interesting enough. Even more interesting, however, are the existence of two small and highly disjunct populations far removed from the main limbata population. One of these is known from Labrador – almost 3,000 miles to the east! Originally referred to subspecies hyperborea, this population was theorized to possibly represent an accidental introduction since individuals appeared to be restricted to open sand habitats within 70 km of the Goose Bay airport (Larson 1986, Pearson et al. 2006). However, careful examination of individuals from this population revealed subspecific differences in maculation (intermediate between hyperborea and nominotypical limbata), lending support to the hypothesis that it is a naturally occurring population and resulting in its description as a distinct subspecies, labradorensis (Johnson 1990). Recent analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences provided additional support for this subspecies as a distinct entity (Knisley et al. 2008), and newly published field observations by tiger beetle afficionados Dave Brzoska and John Stamatov (2008) conducted 19 years after the initial discovery of the population suggest it is well established in suitable habitats much more distant from Goose Bay than originally reported. This accumulation of evidence seems to increasingly support a historical isolation rather than accidental introduction hypothesis. The fifth and final subspecies is an even more recently discovered and equally disjunct population in the Nogahabara Dunes of northwestern Alaska (Pearson et al. 2006). Although individuals from this population resemble subspecies nympha, morphological and mitochondrial DNA sequence analyses support its status as a distinct subspecies, designated nogahabarensis (Knisley et al. 2008). Such an unusual and fragmented distribution for Cicindela limbata and its subspecies is likely the result of historical changes in climate that have caused expansions and contractions of open sand habitats due to fluctuations in available moisture. The current geographical subspecies may have originated at the end of the mid-Holocene hypsithermal (or Holocene Climatic Optimum) some 5,000 years ago, when previously expansive open sand habitats would have begun shrinking and fragmenting as a result of declining temperatures and increasing moisture regimes.

REFERENCES

Brzoska, D. W. and J. Stamatov. 2008. A trip to Goose Bay, Labrador, Canada. Cicindela 40(3):47-52.

Johnson, W. 1990. A new subspecies of Cicindela limbata Say from Labrador (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Le Naturaliste Canadien 116(4) [dated 1989]:261-266.

Larson, D. J. 1986. The tiger beetle, Cicindela limbata hyperborea LeConte, in Goose Bay, Labrador (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 40(3):249-250.

Knisley, C. B., M. R. Woodcock and A. Vogler. 2008. A new subspecies of Cicindela limbata (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) from Alaska and further review of the maritima group by using mitochondrial DNA analysis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101(2):277-288.

Morgan, M., C. B. Knisley and A. Vogler. 2000. New taxonomic status of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela limbata albissima (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): evidence from mtDNA. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93(5):1108-1115.

Pearson, D. L., C. B. Knisley and C. J. Kazilek. 2006. A Field Guide to the Tiger Beetles of the United States and Canada. Oxford University Press, New York, 227 pp.

Posted in Cicindelidae, Coleoptera | Tagged , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

“My favorite bettle”

Today’s essay is by guest blogger (and perhaps future entomologist), Madison MacRae. Currently a 3rd grade student at Pond Elementary School, Madison’s interests include ice skating, tetherball, basketball, piano, dancing, singing, and hiking/bug collecting with her dad. Next year they will be something else. Madison would like to be a grade school teacher when she grows up. She would also like to be a nurse… and a fire fighter… and a football player. This is Madison’s second guest contribution to Beetles In The Bush, the first appearing on February 6, 2008 where she discussed the job responsibilities of a professional entomologist. For today’s contribution, Madison will be discussing one of the insects she saw on a visit to Missouri’s sand prairies back in early September [Ed. note: the insect in question appears to be an intergrade population of Cicindela scutellaris, characterized by their green coloration (unicolor influence) with variable maculation (lecontei influence)]. The original article was submitted as school work (with no prompting or prior knowledge by her dad!) and is reprinted here by the kind permission of its author.

MacRae, M. I.  2008.  My favorite bettle.  Privately published, 1 p., 1 color pl.

Posted in Cicindelidae, Coleoptera | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

“Dungers and Chafers – a Trip to South Africa”

Those of you who enjoy field trip accounts should check out the December 2008 issue of SCARABS. The lead article – authored by your’s truly – is a scarabcentric travelogue of an insect collecting trip I took to South Africa several years ago. Scarabs?!, you say? Well, even though I focus on bups, ‘bycids, and tigers (some would argue that actually demonstrates lack of focus), I never pass on the opportunity to collect “cool” insects of all types when traveling somewhere as “exotic” as Africa – and scarabs are definitely cool! Still, I did manage to sneak past the editors a few words and pictures about buprestids, one of the more impressive of which I offer here as further enticement. You can also read about heart attacks, flying Tonka trucks, and evil minions.

Photos: (above) me standing next to a termite mound near the Waterberg, Northern Province (photo by Chuck Bellamy); (left) Evides pubiventris (family Buprestidae, tribe Evidiini) suns itself on high terminal foliage of Lannea discolor (family Anacardiaceae), Waterberg, Northern Province.

Posted in Buprestidae, Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Superior Scribbler Award

Huckleberry at Huckleberry Days recently honored me with a Superior Scribbler Award. Huckleberry maintains an excellent blog about “Biodiversity, conservation, natural history and more, mostly in British Columbia, Canada, mostly in the Fraser River Delta, but sometimes not…” I enjoy their richly illustrated posts, often highlighting invasive plants and the impacts they’ve had on natural communities in the Delta. I am pleased to have made their list of selections and thank Huckleberry for the consideration.

Superior Scribbler award
The Scholastic Scribe, originator of The Award, provides some rules that come with this award:

  1. Each Superior Scribbler must in turn pass The Award on to 5 most-deserving Bloggy Friends.
  2. Each Superior Scribbler must link to the author and the name of the blog from whom he/she has received The Award.
  3. Each Superior Scribbler must display The Award on his/her blog and link to this post, which explains The Award.
  4. Each Blogger who wins The Superior Scribbler Award must visit this post and add his/her name to the Mr. Linky List. That way, we’ll be able to keep up-to-date on everyone who receives This Prestigious Honor!
  5. Each Superior Scribbler must post these rules on his/her blog.

Items 2-5 are now satisfied; however, the requirement to nominate five other blogs has me a bit stumped. Not that I don’t think there are five that are deserving – quite the contrary, there are many other blogs that I enjoy, though often for different reasons. Some provide a quick, humorous quip, while others offer comprehensive insight on technical subjects. Some provide timely updates on items in the news, while others offer captivating glimpses into some personal journey or mission. Some emphasize photos, others emphasize prose. What they all have in common is that they possess some unique and, to me, interesting perspective on natural history. One only needs to look at my fairly long blog roll to see which I find interesting enough to follow on a regular basis. Since many of these are already very well known and popular, an award from little ol’ me hardly seems necessary. As a result, I have decided to bend the “5 blogs” rule and, instead, highlight just one blog that, for me, really stands out for its combination of interesting subject matter, impassioned writing, and lovely photographs. That blog is Ozark Highlands of Missouri, by the talented Allison Vaughn. A native of Louisiana and college classics major, Allison found her way to my beloved Ozark Highlands after a brief stint in Missouri’s Southeast Lowlands. Her blog’s subheading, “Musings on Missouri’s most ecologically diverse and culturally fascinating landscape”, aptly alludes to the rich variety found in her deftly written posts. From descriptions of fragile natural communities and searches for rare, endemic plants, to discussions of responses (anthropic and natural) to fire regimes and essays on significant cultural events in the region’s history, Allison’s writings are at once informative and insightful, yet intimate and introspective. Almost two years old by the time I discovered it earlier this year, Ozark Highlands of Missouri is one of the few blogs that I have gone back and read in its entirety. I don’t know if Allison, endearingly modest as she is, will accept this award, but I highly recommend you visit her blog and read a few of her posts. Treat it as a delicious novel – something warm to cozy up to with a hot cup of tea as we enter the long winter months ahead.

Posted in [No taxon] | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Two new species of Agrilus from Mexico

ResearchBlogging.orgThe enormous, cosmopolitan genus Agrilus (family Buprestidae – commonly called jewel beetles or metallic woodboring beetles) contains nearly 4,000 described species (Bellamy 2008). With many more still awaiting description, it is perhaps the largest genus in the entire animal kingdom (Bellamy 2003). Agrilus species are primarily twig and branch borers, utilizing recently dead wood for larval development – although there are notable exceptions, e.g. Agrilus anxius (bronze birch borer), A. bilineatus (twolined chestnut borer), and A. planipennis (emerald ash borer), which attack the trunks of living trees and, thus, are of significant economic importance in forest and ornamental landscapes. Host specificity among Agrilus species ranges from highly monophagous – associated exclusively with a single plant species – to rather oliphagous – utilizing several, usually related, plant genera. Adults of Agrilus species are most often found on the foliage of their larval hosts and do not generally visit flowers, as is common in some other genera (e.g., Acmaeodera and Anthaxia). Interestingly, despite the diversity and worldwide distribution of the genus, no species of Agrilus are known to be associated with coniferous plants – a fact that has limited their expansion into the vast northern boreal forests.

Texas, Bexar Co., San Antonio, nr. Fort Sam Houston, em. 25.iv-14.v.1997 ex Phoradendron tomentosum coll. ii.1997, D. Heffern & D. W. SundbergAs can be imagined by its enormity, a comprehensive understanding of the genus will remain a distant goal for many years. Progress will come incrementally, as formal descriptions of new species gradually improve our knowledge of the fauna that exists in each of the world’s main biogeographic provinces. In a recent issue of the online journal Zootaxa, Dr. Henry Hespenheide (UCLA) describes two new species of Agrilus from Mexico. These two species are interesting because of their association with ‘mistletoe’ plants in the genus Phoradendron (family Viscaceae1), obligate hemiparasites that attach to branches and stems of various woody trees and shrubs in tropical and warm temperate regions of the New World. Plants in this genus are known to support a variety of host-restricted insect herbivores, principally in the orders Hemiptera, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. A single buprestid species has been associated with Phoradendron to this point – Agrilus turnbowi, recently described from specimens reared from dead stems of Phoradendron tomentosum attached to mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) in southern Texas (Nelson 1990) and pictured here from a specimen in my collection that was reared from dead mistletoe collected at the type locality. At the time of its description, this species was not relatable to any of the other known species in the genus.

1 The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2003) includes the Viscaceae in a broader circumscription of the family Santalaceae. However, recent molecular studies suggest the Santalaceae are polyphyletic, with strong support for Viscaceae as a distinct, monophyletic clade (Der & Nickrent 2008).

The two new Mexican species – A. andersoni from Guerrero and Puebla (Figs. 1-3), and A. howdenorum from Oaxaca (Figs. 4-6) – are apparently related to A. turnbowi, which they resemble by their purplish-red coloration and complex pattern of golden setae on the elytra. They are also superficially very similar to each other but differ most notably in size and the overall color and pattern of setae on the elytra.

Figures 1–3. Agrilus andersoni Hespenheide: 1. dorsal habitus; 2. lateral habitus (scale bar indicates 2.0 mm); 3. genitalia of male (scale bar indicates 0.5 mm) (from Hespenheide 2008).

Figures 4–6. Agrilus howdenorum Hespenheide: 4. dorsal habitus; 5. lateral habitus (scale bar indicates 2.0 mm); 6. genitalia of male (scale bar indicates 0.5 mm) (from Hespenheide 2008).

Hespenheide speculates that the color and pattern of the golden setae on the elytra may serve to make the beetles less conspicuous by disruptive coloration, noting the similar coloration of the setae to the leaves of Phoradendron as seen in the photograph of Agrilus howdenorum on its host plant (Fig. 7). This form of crypsis may also be enhanced by the purplish-red ground coloration of the adult, which resembles that of the small, darkened blemishes often observed on the foliage of these plants.

Figure 7. Agrilus howdenorum adult on mistletoe host plant near Diaz Ordaz, Oaxaca, México. The golden setae on the elytra are similar in color to the leaves of the mistletoe and may function as a disruptive color pattern. Photograph by C.L. Bellamy (from Hespenheide 2008).

REFERENCES

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141: 399-436.

Bellamy, C. L. 2003. The stunning world of jewel beetles. Wings, Essays on Invertebrate Conservation, 26(2): 13-17.

Bellamy, C. L. 2008. A World Catalogue and Bibliography of the Jewel Beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestoidea), Volume 4: Agrilinae: Agrilina through Trachyini. Pensoft Series Faunistica No. 79, 722 pp.

Der, J. P. & D. L. Nickrent. 2008. A Molecular Phylogeny of Santalaceae (Santalales). Systematic Botany, 33(1):107-116.

Hespenheide, H. A. (2008). New Agrilus Curtis species from mistletoe in México (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Zootaxa, 1879, 52-56

Nelson, G. H. 1990. A new species of Agrilus reared from mistletoe in Texas (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 44(3):374-376.

Posted in Buprestidae, Coleoptera, Viscaceae | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Five Things Meme

Adrian Thysse has tagged me with The Five Things Meme:

5 things I was doing 10 years ago:

  • Enjoying my second year of fatherhood
  • Revising the North American species of the cerambycid beetle genus Purpuricenus
  • Collecting beetles in Arizona with Chuck Bellamy and Art Evans
  • Learning to speak Spanish
  • Worrying a lot more about career advancement than I do now

5 things on my to do-list today:

  • Take kids to the dentist – check
  • Put up kids tether ball pole – abort (pole sections don’t fit, need to exchange)
  • Vacuum carpets throughout the house – check
  • Hang pictures I took of wildflowers this spring (chosen, nicely framed, and given to me by my wife for my birthday) – check
  • Short 20-mile bike ride – CHECK!

5 snacks I love:

  • Spudmaster CollosalChips, handmade in the heart of Missouri
  • GK Select Gourmet Blend nuts (collosal cashews, almonds, macadamias & pecans)
  • Raspberry or blueberry scone and coffee
  • Pemmican Premium beef jerky, peppered
  • Chocolate covered almonds/raisins/strawberries/etc.

5 things I would do if I was a millionaire:

  • Help my dad retire
  • Enroll kids in private school
  • Substantial contributions to The Nature Conservancy
  • Buy a few acres on the west shore of Lake Tahoe
  • TRAVEL!

5 places I’ve lived:

  • Kansas City, Missouri (childhood)
  • Columbia, Missouri (university)
  • St. Louis, Missouri (1st job)
  • Sacramento, California (2nd job)
  • St. Louis, Missouri (3rd job)

5 jobs I’ve had:

  • Injection Mold Operator (3 mos)
  • Pizza Cook (9 mos)
  • Research Assistant (2 yrs)
  • Agricultural Inspector (8 yrs)
  • Research Entomologist (18 yrs)

And I tag Allison Vaughn, Doug Taron, Hugh, cedrorum and Huckleberry.

Posted in [No taxon] | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Pardon my introspection

In addition to this blog, I maintain a second, older blog called Bikes, Bugs, and Bones. That snarkier, decidedly less erudite site was my first venture into the world of blogging, initiated some two and a half years ago not due to any particular vision on my part, but more as a reaction to other blogs that were popping up by people I knew in the St. Louis cycling scene. At that time, I was deeply immersed in the world of amateur bike racing, and a blog seemed to be a natural outlet for reporting my take on the races in which I participated. The title – Bikes, Bugs, and Bones – was a reflection of my propensity to be interested in too many things (with not enough time). In reality, however, my surging interest in cycling had by then pushed my longer held entomological and natural history interests to the back burner, and my posts on that blog – then and now – dealt almost exclusively with bicycles and racing. For several reasons racing was something I needed to do, and I had a good run – winning 14 races in seven years (including three state championships) and crowing it all with a highly respectable finish in the 2007 Etape du Tour (an amateur race held on the “Queen stage” route of the Tour de France). My interest in entomology and natural history never waivered during this time, but the demands of training relegated any meaningful field work to short windows before the racing season began and after it ended each year. Eventually, the entomologist in me could be suppressed no longer, and at the end of last year I decided that I needed to get back to doing what I loved – bug collecting! I made a commitment to return entomology field work to its rightful place as my first priority (after family and work, of course) and race bicycles as time permitted. (I have since completely retired from racing, although I still ride and maintain Bikes, Bugs, and Bones as an outlet for discussing all things cycling.) As an expression of that renewed commitment, I started a new blog – this blog – and after much frustration finding that every blog name I thought of had already been thought of by someone else (and generally abandoned after only a few posts) settled on the name Beetles In The Bush. One year ago today – November 24, 2007 – I posted my first entry to this new blog (a subsequent entry, a list of my publications, was backdated to November 23).

Beetles In The Bush started with a simple mission – to document my entomological and other natural history experiences and provide an outlet for the photographs that I was beginning to take. Late fall is not the best time to begin an insect blog, especially with no insect photos on hand to serve as starter material. As a result, my initial posts appeared rather infrequently – primarily whenever I had the opportunity to do a winter hike. It was those first few hikes, however, and my efforts to write something interesting about the natural history represented in the photographs that I took, that called attention to what I realized was a glaring gap in my overall knowledge of natural history. I was a competent entomologist, to be sure, but that competency did not extend to general botany (other than the mostly woody plants with which the insects I studied were associated), or to the natural communities in which those plants and insects occurred, or to the geology of the landforms that contained those natural communities, or to the manner in which these fields intersect, an understanding of which I would have to have before I could consider myself a competent natural historian. More than just an outlet for posting pictures and stories about my adventures, Beetles In The Bush also quickly became a tool to help me learn more about botany, ecology, geology, and related fields. I have read more non-entomology literature in the past year than I have since earning my degrees, and since knowledge and passion are intimately linked in a positive feedback loop, I’ve found myself becoming even more passionate about entomology, too. I still have much to learn – I am a work in progress, far from complete. But in this case, it is the journey that is also the reward.

Like all bloggers, I’d like to think that I have a large, regular following, and that over time more and more people will find my writings interesting and worthy of their time. The numbers don’t support this – as of this one-year anniversary, Beetles In The Bush has received 6,987 hits – not triffling but by no means extraordinary. While the graph below shows steady growth during the first year of existence, the numbers don’t come within a rifle’s shot of some of the really popular natural history and science blogs. I surmise the main reason for this involves a relatively lower posting frequency – a little more than once per week on average instead of the daily or near daily frequency seen with many blogs. I suppose also my relatively specialized subject matter and tendency to ramble on are contributing factors. I have thought about writing smaller, more frequent posts and expanding my subject matter to create greater interest; however, in doing this I realized that what I enjoy most is writing stories about the things that interest me – stories that teach, stories that impart a sense of the passion that I feel, stories that allow me to reflect on what I’ve learned and what I still don’t know. If that makes a broad, daily readership less likely, so be it – I understand now that I’m doing this as much for me as anyone else. So, I mark this first anniversary with a resolution to wean myself from the lure of trying to increase traffic and refocusing my efforts on doing what I enjoy most – writing silly little stories about the things I stumble upon on my journey to become a better natural historian. For the readership that I do have, I am grateful. More importantly, I am thankful for the goodly number of “friendships” that have resulted from these writings. Thank you for your interest, and I sincerely hope that some day I have the chance to meet many of you in person.

Beetles in the Bush - first year summary

Posted in [No taxon] | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

A new species of Xenorhipus from Baja California

ResearchBlogging.orgA few months ago I discussed Trichinorhipis knulli of the tribe Xenorhipidini (family Buprestidae). Members of this tribe exhibit highly sexually dimorphic antennae, with the distal segments of the male antennae highly modified into a very extended flabellate or lamellate condition. The surfaces of the flabellae/lamellae are covered with numerous, presumably olfactory sensillae that are lacking on female antennae (which retain the unmodified serrate condition), strongly suggesting a function involving detection of female sex pheromones. Although chemosensory structures are present on the antennae of nearly all buprestids, the extreme modification exhibited by the males of species in this tribe is not a common occurrence. Nevertheless, similar modifications have evolved independently in a few other genera within the family, including Knowltonia (four species in western North America), Mendizabalia and Australorhipis (monotypic genera in South America and Australia, respectively), and two species of the enormous Australian genus Castiarina. Indeed, males of Knowltonia and the two Castiarina species possess what might be termed ‘bipectinate’ or ‘biflabellate’ antennae due to dual projections from the terminal antennomeres (see Bellamy & Nylander 2007 for a more complete discussion of male antennal modifications in Buprestidae). The tribe Xenorhipidini is the most diverse group in which these modifications have arisen, comprised of the monotypic Trichinorhipis from California and the closely related Hesperorhipis (four species in Arizona and California) and Xenorhipis (until now, 14 species from North and South America and the West Indies).

Xenorhipis bajacalifornica Westcott, 2008 – holotype ♂ (1) & allotype ♀ (2).
Photos by Steve Valley (Oregon Department of Agriculture).

In a recent issue of the online journal Zootaxa, Rick Westcott (Oregon Department of Agriculture) describes a new species of Xenorhipis from the Cape Region of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Although assigned to the genus Xenorhipis, the new species – X. bajacalifornica – seems to bridge the gap between the genera Xenorhipis and Hesperorhipis. As currently recognized, Xenorhipis is distinguished from Hesperorhipis by the shape of the posterior coxal plates, which are scarcely narrowed laterally in the former genus, while in the latter genus they are triangular and with the hind margin strongly oblique. In X. bajacalifornica the posterior coxal plates are somewhat triangular but not as acute laterally as in some species of Hesperorhipis. Xenorhipis bajacalifornica also differs from other described Xenorhipis in its strongly abbreviated elytra, which in males barely reach the second ventrite – similar to species of Hesperorhipis. Other described Xenorhipis exhibit less abbreviated elytra, which cover at least the first three ventrites and in some species almost the entire abdomen. Despite these similarities to Hesperorhipis, a consistent distinguishing character between the two genera was found in the male antenna – in Xenorhipis the flabellar processes begin with the second antennomere, while in Hesperorhipis they begin with the third. It was on this basis that the new species was assigned to the genus Xenorhipis. (The genus Trichinorhipis differs from both Xenorhipis and Hesperorhipis by its rounded rather than quadrate pronotum and its unabbreviated elytra that cover the entire abdomen and has, as a result, been placed in its own subtribe.)

Xenorhipis brendeli ♂Xenorhipis brendeli ♀The photos left show the male (L) and female (R) of Xenorhipis brendeli, the only species in the tribe occurring in eastern North America (west to Minnesota and eastern Texas). Adults of this species are not commonly encountered and have been collected on a variety of deciduous hardwoods but reared almost exclusively from species of hickory (genus Carya). These individuals were reared from dead branches collected in southeastern Missouri – the male from pecan (Carya illinoensis) and the female from shellbark hickory (Carya laciniosa). The male exhibits the scarcely abbreviated elytra that cover almost the entire abdomen (as discussed above). Stan Wellso reported large numbers of males attracted to caged live females in Texas, apparently responding to sex pheromones released by the females.

Xenorhipis osborni ♀Xenorhipis osborni ♂This is another species in the genus – Xenorhipis osborni – known from west Texas. Joseph Knull described the species in 1936 from specimens collected in the Davis Mountains on whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta), but larval hosts remained unknown until I reared a series of these specimens from dead branches of black acacia (Acacia rigidula) collected above the Pecos River in Val Verde County. I’ve also reared a few specimens from dead branches of catclaw acacia (Acacia greggii) collected in Big Bend National Park, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it breeds in other species of acacia. Again, in this speices the elytra are only slightly abbreviated, though more so than in Xenorhipis brendeli above and also more so in the male (L) than in the female (R). The male of this species is one of the prettiest I’ve encountered in the tribe.

Hesperorhipis albofasciatus ♂Hesperorhipis albofasciatus ♀The genus Hesperorhipis is illustrated here by these photos of H. albofasciatus. These specimens were reared by Rick Westcott from dead branches of walnut (Juglans sp.) – its only known host – collected in Tulare County, California. The elytra in this species are much more abbreviated than in Xenorhipis brendeli and X. osborni but similar to those of X. bajacalifornica – again with the male (L) exhiting greater abbreviation than the female (R). The three remaining species of Hesperorhipis exhibit even more highly abbreviated elytra than H. albofasciatus.

Dr. Charles Bellamy (California Department of Food and Agriculture) is currently revising the tribe. It will be interesting to see how, ulimately, he treats Xenorhipis and Hesperorhipis, given the blended characters exhibited by some species.

REFERENCE

Westcott, R. L. (2008). A new species of Xenorhipis LeConte and of Mastogenius Solier from Mexico, with a discussion of Chrysobothris ichthyomorpha Thomson and its allies and notes on other Mexican and Central American Buprestidae (Coleoptera) Zootaxa, 1929, 47-68

Posted in Buprestidae, Coleoptera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments