My Canon 8X Macro Lens

For the past few months I have started routinely using extension tubes with my 100mm macro lens for photographing tiger beetles. I do this primarily because for most tiger beetles and other insects in the smallish to medium-sized range I need the capability to go both above and below 1X magnification, meaning that I must constantly switch between my Canon 100mm lens (1X maximum) and MP-E 65mm lens (1X minimum). With a full extension tube set (68mm), my 100mm macro lens effectively becomes a 0.7–2.0X macro lens, a nice range of magnifications for most of the photographs that I take. There is a secondary benefit to this in that the subject-to-lens distance is decreased somewhat, allowing me to get the MT-24EX flash heads closer to the subject for better lighting.

Lately I’ve been wondering what the magnification capabilities would be if I added extension tubes to the 65mm lens.  With a maximum magnification of 5X, it hardly seems that even more magnification would ever be needed, but who knows what uses one might find if the capability exists.  In theory, it seemed like it should work—after all extension tubes are simply tubes with no glass (in fact, the 65mm lens itself is simply a macro lens with a very expensive, built-in bellows).  The only consideration was whether the focal plane would remain outside of the lens.  Tonight I finally decided to sit down and try it out, and the results were really quite stunning.  The three photos below show an ordinary pencil lead, the first with the 65mm lens alone set at 1X, the second with the lens set at 1X plus full extension tubes, and the third with full extension tubes and the lens set at 5X.  The full extension tube set provides an additional ~1.7X magnification, making the 65mm lens effectively a 1.7–8.0X macro lens!

Canon MP-E 65mm lens @ 1X

Canon MP-E 65mm lens @ 1X + 68mm extension tubes (= 1.7X)

Canon MP-E 1-5X macro lens @ 5X + 68mm extension tubes (= 8X)

The subject-to-lens distance is indeed quite short—only about 38mm or so.  However, having at my disposal an 8X macro lens suddenly opens up a whole new world of ideas for insect macrophotography.  Knowing that the combination of 65mm lens and extension tubes is possible, I just had to try this out on a living subject—like now!  I happened to have in a terrarium a subject from the day’s collecting, so I tried it out—again with the 65mm lens fully extended to result in 8X magnification.  Shown below is a example of this lens combination at full magnification, completely uncropped—can you name the subject?

Canon MP-E 65mm lens @ 5X + 68mm extension tubes (= 8X)

Copyright © Ted C. MacRae 2011

37 thoughts on “My Canon 8X Macro Lens

  1. Interesting. With the extension tubes on MP-E 65mm for 8X magnification, curious as to the working distance between lens and subject.

    • You’re right, it’s a tiger beetle eye. Btw, the compound eye is composed of facets rather than ocellii (the latter are simple eyes separate from the compound eye in some insects).

      Love the microscope!

  2. Like to know the camera settings, especially the flash? Was it full blown with the diffusers attached, what was the approx distance to the subject. Need help setting up your next super macro shot?

    • All photos were shot at ISO 400, 1/250 sec, f/14, and full flash (ETTL, FEC -1 1/3) w/ Sto-Fen + Gary Fong Puffer diffusers. As mentioned in the last paragraph the approximate working distance was ~38 mm.

  3. Hmm… just canceled my collecting trip with my field biology class due to weather conditions. Batteries are charged and camera is ready to go, and I have a set of extension tubes sitting here next to me. I think my day is now shaping up!

  4. Nice demonstration! Definitely a Tiger beetle of some kind…

    The only thing to watch is your effective aperture, I’d imagine you’re already into visible diffraction range at 8x and f2.8, so you’ll need to be very careful closing the lens down at all…

  5. Really nice Ted! I agree with some of the others, you now have a microscope at your command! Keep up your great work and experimentation!

    • Lighting was bit of a problem with my front-of-lens mounted twin flashes – I mounted each of them on a Kaiser shoe so I could angle them all the way down in front of the lens. It still wasn’t perfect but was easily adjusted in PhotoShop. I have a bracket idea that I’ve been thinking of for awhile that would take care of this problem also.

      Nice parasitoid photo! More mag would have been nice, but as is it emphasizes the wasp’s minuteness.

  6. Very interesting use of the mpe, i noted you exposed with flash at 1/250, what camera body are you using ? I can only go to 1/200 with the 5d mkii or the 550d. As a hand held shot this is pretty impressive as the view must be very dim through the eyepiece or do you use live view?

    • Hi John – thanks for your comments. I used a Canon 50D body and helped illuminate the view through the viewfinder by using the flash head lamps on my MT-24EX twin flash. Since this is a full flash exposure, the effective shutter speed is actually much shorter than 1/250 sec (illumination comes strictly from the flash pulse), so that helps increase the sharpness.

  7. Pingback: Macro Flash Solutions — I

    • Hi Edward – cool collembolan photos! I would have never thought to try two sets of extension tubes.

      I now think that diffraction—a result of my high f setting—is a bigger problem with my attempts than motion blur, and I see your lower f values have indeed resulted in better photos. Might be best to use this with very flat focal plane subjects and open up the aperture all the way. First one to put up their attempts wins! 🙂


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s